Citat:

Pa, pitam ja vas... sta vi mislite o zenama na vlasti: da li ih treba postavljati i da li time pokazuju svoje najvece slabosti ili naprotiv, sve svoje najbolje osobine.

Lichno smatram da zhene pokazuju svoje najvece i najbolje osobine kada dodju na vlast........bar je moje saznanje takvo.Sve zhene koje poznajem, a koje su ukljuchene u politiku, su fantastichne osobe........i pri tome prate sve principe uspeha.

Bilo ko po dolasku na polozhaj pokazhe ko je. "Daj choveku vlast, pa tjesh videti ko je.", lepo rekao narod.
Ne mislim da se zhene i mushkarci bitno razlikuju. Svako dodje u situaciju da pokazhe i ne obuzda svoju slabost ili da dodje do izrazhaja neka od najboljih osobina.
Inache, ne priznajem nikakvu vlast...eto....

A da li ima imalo istine u izjavi da: ...Glupi muškarac napreduje brže od pametne žene...

Nažalost, to se obično dešava... niko ne veruje da su dečaci u goroj situaciji iz godine u godinu! I sve više zaostaju i to ne svojom krivicom... Ja kad nešto kažem obično imam i čime da potkrepim... A evo i činjenica... zvaničnih! I mnogi dobronamerni javni radnici godinama već dižu uzbubu.... ali društvo i dalje sprovodi politiku koja jednostavno uništava muškarce i njihov način razmišljanja i vaspitanja... pogledajte samo rezultate od 3 razreda nagore... sve gori po dečake! Čak su u Ministarstvu za obrazovanje tražili da se prestane sa uticajem ženskog lobija u tretmanu dečaka kao učenika drugog reda! To su fakti koje SVAKODNEVNO SREĆEM VEĆ GODINAMA!

Citat:

Research highlights that girls are performing much better than boys at school, from infants through to high school. But this is not because girls are in any way smarter than boys. Before government intervention, boys and girls performed about the same academically. However, to pacify the women's lobby the various state governments have poured millions into girls' education. More girls than boys are now also entering tertiary education. Yet despite these facts, the government continues to focus its attention on improving even more the education of girls, resulting in performance gaps that increase every year. The Early Years Data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics indicate the following results[1]: Attaining Year 3 Benchmarks Skill_____________Boys_____________Girls Reading literacy_____91% ____________94% Numeracy__________93%_____________93% Attaining Year 5 Benchmarks Skill_____________Boys_____________Girls Reading literacy____85%_____________90% Numeracy _________89%_____________90% In scientific literacy tests, girls again performed almost 1% better than boys.[2] Later Education Each year, Higher School Certificate results show that girls are significantly outperforming boys. In the 2001 NSW Higher School Certificate, of the 123 First Place awards given, 79 went to girls and only 44 to boys.[3] That is, 80% more girls than boys achieved top position. Occassionally this has been even worse: in the 1998 NSW HSC, boys came first only in 2 and 3-unit computing studies and mathematics in practice: girls came first in every other subject.[4] Girls comprise 55% of all higher education students, and boys only 45%.[5] A report[6] funded by the Commonwealth Department of Education, Training a Youth Affairs found the retention rate to Year 12 for girls was 78.5%, while for boys it was only 66.4%. The report also found that more females than males enter university education. Why Such Differences? For decades the government has commissioned reports, implemented policies and provided funding to raise the level of performance of girls. Comparable educational results between boys and girls were achieved many years ago, however the government has continued to bolster education for girls (and intentionally neglected boys) in an attempt to keep the women's lobby on-side. A report [7] to the government mentions "gender biases" in the curriculum, as well as teaching and assessment methods as possible reasons girls are now performing better than boys at school. However this was just one of many reports to the government - reports that have existed for a decade now. But the government continues to do nothing about boys' education. Why? The reasons are that such results help the government achieve two objectives. By keeping boys out of higher education: the government forces more boys into moving into the lower-paid trades, thereby increasing the supply of people for those jobs, keeping salaries down; more girls will be able to enter higher-paid, professional work, thus bolstering support for the government from the women's lobby. Hopefully, this treatment of Australian schoolboys as second-class citizens will eventually end. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [1] Australian Social Trends 2002 (Education - Educational Attainment: Literacy and numeracy among school students) - Australian Bureau of Statistics [2] Australian Social Trends 2002 (Education - Educational Attainment: Literacy and numeracy among school students) - Australian Bureau of Statistics [3] Board Bulletin - Board of Studies NSW, February 2002 [4] Australian Social Trends 2002 (Education - State summary tables(a)) - Australian Bureau of Statistics [5] Australian Social Trends 2002 (Education - State summary tables(a)) - Australian Bureau of Statistics [6] Factors Influencing the Educational Performance of Males and Females in School and their Initial Destinations after Leaving School - Collins, Kenway & McLeod, July 2000 [7] Submission to the Parliamentary Inquiry into the Education of Boys - Jennifer Buckingham, July 2000

Što se mene tiče, meni su svi ravnopravni... a zašto se neke stvari dešavaju uvek ima svoj razlog... jedna nepravda se ne može uravnotežiti drugom, već možemo samo dobiti dve nepravde... ali OK je, ja se u stvari mnogo ne uznemiravam, volim da diskutujem, ali znam da na kraju sve dođe na svoje, pa ne uzimam ništa preozbiljno...

Larissa ::

Interesantno je to da muskarci vide kada njihova strana zaostaje, a sto su zene bile vekovima gradani drugog reda to ih nije previse brinulo. Zato i kazem, vreme je da se stvari malo uravnoteze.

Ono što si nazvala uravnoteženo je uz fakte koje sam priložio za mene nepravda! A pošto vidim da je jedan od razloga za to "uravnotežavanje" (koje je za mene nepravda) to što su žene vekovima bile građani drugog reda (iako se ni s time ne bih uvek složio, jer pre patrijarhata je vladao matrijarhat, koji se još uvek nalazi kod nekih naroda) upotrebio sam rečenice koje sam upotrebio... i ne izvinjavam se za ono što mislim i dalje... A izraz OZBILJNO nisam upotrebio... već PREOZBILJNO... jer kad uzmemo nešto preozbiljno obično se popalimo... a kada se popalimo onda nema tu mnogo racionalnog razmišljanja...

Ipak, ovde još uvek vlada normala pa se nadam da niko ne gazi u "preozbiljne" vode. Ja sam čuo mišljenje i iako se ne slažem, prihvatio ga kao tvoje... i to je to... svako ima pravo na svoje mišljenje, a život nam na kraju pokaže šta valja, a šta je bilo zabluda!